February 15, 2012Innovation in Qualitative Market Research: Choosing the Right Approach
posted by
Jessica Ritzo,
Head of Online Qualitative
in
Qualitative Research,
Customized Research,
Innovation & Marketing Research
Here we are at the beginning of another year… a
time to reflect on the past and set goals for the future. As
a self-professed lover of all things qualitative, it's this time of
year that I find myself thinking about key qualitative research
learnings over the past twelve months and how those learnings can
be applied to drive greater successes in the year ahead.
Innovative technology-based qualitative approaches were at the top
of my list of learnings last year, and continue to be a focus of
many internal and external discussions as we head into
2012.
New Qualitative Research
Techniques
Over the course of 2011, I attended
numerous industry conferences, including the Technology Driven
Market Research Event held in May, the annual QRCA conference held
in October, and The Market Research Event held in November.
Along with allowing me to reconnect with many familiar faces and
meet some new research partners, these conferences provided
valuable additional learning about new, innovative approaches being
developed and the variety of ways in which companies are using
them. For example, techniques like gamification (applying a
game-like look and feel to research design to increase participant
engagement and drive deeper feedback), crowdsourcing (leveraging
community collaboration to develop ideas or complete tasks),
virtual shopping environments (online and in-person), and
neuromarketing (examining consumers' brain responses to stimuli)
all received significant mention in 2011, with good reason.
As technology continues to advance, our options for connecting with
consumers will continue to expand.
New Qualitative Research Technique
Adoption
As more options become available and the
buzz around them begins to build, it is not uncommon for some
research buyers and providers to want to use them primarily out of
curiosity. I get it; they're new and exciting, and they can
be the appropriate solution in some cases…but that doesn't make
them right for every research initiative. And, while
excitement around these approaches is high (and in some cases, high
enough to drive interest in using them even in less-than-ideal
situations), expected actual usage of them is quite low. In
fact, in a recent GreenBook Research Industry Trends Report (Spring
2011) article focusing on results from a Technology Adoption survey
among research buyers and providers, many of these newer
technology-based approaches such as virtual environments,
neuromarketing, and games fell to the bottom of the list of
approaches research professionals realistically expect to use most
often in the future (landing at #12, #14, and #15 of 16 approaches,
respectively). Meanwhile, the technology-based approaches
expected to be used most often by researchers on the client and
supplier side are those that don't tend to get as much buzz these
days but have become trusted over the last several years:
mobile surveys, online communities, social media analysis,
webcam-based interviews/groups, and mobile
qualitative.
New or Old: "One Size" Qualitative
Research Does Not Fit All
At IIM, we recognize the importance of
approaching each project with an open mind when it comes to
identifying the most appropriate methodology, and advising our
clients on the approach that will allow us to get as close as
possible to the consumer in that particular situation.
Sometimes that's traditional focus groups, but sometimes its
real-time mobile video, digital diaries, asynchronous online
discussions, or even spending a day in consumers' homes immersing
ourselves in their lives. While each of these approaches (as
well as the newer ones mentioned previously) is exciting in itself,
I'm most energized by the fact that we simply have so many options
from which to choose. Furthermore, it's not always a single
approach that will yield the deepest consumer understanding but,
rather, a combination of proven approaches used simultaneously or
in sequence.
While the ever-growing array of
techniques is exciting, I've heard from some of our clients that it
can also be overwhelming - particularly since their need to
complete the research and understand its key insights is often on a
more compressed timeline than ever before. This is where
being true consultants, as opposed to researchers, lends tremendous
value. Knowing which options are available and which will be
most effective in achieving each individual project's objectives -
rather than taking a "one size fits all" approach or using a
technique just because it's the newest one available - is key to
getting as close as possible to the consumer and uncovering the
critical key insights.